Any action on climate change that doesn't relate directly to cutting emissions is lower down the priority list for governments and industry, because CO2 is the most important greenhouse gas for most sectors.
Yet unlike other sectors, aviation also has very significant non-CO2 impacts.สล็อต โจ๊กเกอร์ is a slot game that was created. to provide opportunities for those who are interested and want to study And train yourself to use the technique of playing slots first.
Prof Settler believes that people have hesitated to reduce contrails by diverting flights because of fears it would be completely unfeasible - that all flights might have to be changed or it would hugely increase fuel consumption. This latest research shows this is not the case.
Dr Jarlath Molloy, senior environmental affairs manager at the air traffic service provider, NATS, agrees that up until now, there has been a lack of focus on non-CO2 problems from the entire industry.
Yet from an operational perspective, tackling contrails is "just one extra element the aircraft would have to compute", he says, and it could even be managed in a similar way to how authorities already orchestrate groups of flights to avoid big winter storms.
"We're exploring the feasibility of it and what we'd have to do to manage flights looking for the same routes" Dr Molloy adds.The Department for Transport says it is "currently considering" a range of responses to its Jet Zero consultation. on how to "make the sector cleaner and greener", and that this strategy "will aim to address" aviation's non-CO2 impact.
Meanwhile atmospheric scientist Prof Ken Caldiera, from the Carnegie Institution for Science, makes a compelling case. He estimates preventing most of the damaging climate impact of contrails would cost less than $1bn (£720m) a year and the net value of the benefit could be more than a thousand times that.